In theÂ fourth partÂ of hisÂ series, JAMES EVANS examines the evolution of pairs of stadiums across the world; gone are the plastic pitches but the quirky stands and cramped surroundings remain at Loftus Road and Kenilworth Road.
A chair was hurled against the window, which quivered on impact. The line of policeman stood outside The Green did not see fit to enter the pub and merely held formation, censureless.
Certain fans of Plymouth Argyle Football Club had chosen to drink there on account of the name The Green reflecting the colour of the shirts that Plymouth Argyle play in. The Green had been invaded by The Green Army. We drank our pints swiftly, for although we too were supporters of Plymouth Argyle, the launching of furniture towards plate glass fenestrations was not something that particularly interested us. Moreover, the group of people from whence the chair had emanated were surely capable of lobbing chairs in other directions too. In spite of our shared desire to see Plymouth Argyle defeat Queens Park Rangers, the sort of mind that sees fit to toss around furnishings in confined spaces does not tend to discriminate.
Loftus Road in Shepherdâ€™s Bush is a favourite stadium of mine. Unfortunately, the locality has rather a harsh reputation. The gloomy West 12 shopping precinct might have something to do with it, and the West Cross Route is grimmer still. Embedded betwixt Hammersmith, Acton, White City, Notting Hill and Kensington, Shepherdâ€™s Bush can feel squeezed. Shepherdâ€™s Bush Green itself, at its centre, is airy and arboreal, and much of the surrounding housing dates back to the late 19th century â€“ Victorian terraces mainly, which is no bad thing. Still, the environment at Loftus Road is a physical hindrance, prohibiting expansion and limiting development.
Practically speaking, Loftus Road reached its extremity when QPR concurrently rebuilt the School End and Loftus Road stands in 1980 and â€™81 respectively. Loftus Road backs onto terraced housing, whilst the School End overlooks a school â€“ Jack Tizard School precisely. Built in 1972, the Ellerslie Road Stand, on Ellerslie Road, is encumbered with similarly residential concerns. Finally, The South Africa Road Stand (1968/69) is hampered by both its namesake and the four-storey structure that has been tacked on its rear, as functional in its appearance as its purpose dictates: office space.
The overall impression is of rectangular cuboids and of the colour blue. The ground is almost as straightforward as this crude reduction suggests. The South Africa Road Stand is its centrepiece, a tidy two-tiered structure with a single row of executive boxes in between and an outward appearance that belies its age. It is of â€˜post and beamâ€™ construction, but the posts â€“ one at each end and two equidistantly between â€“ are relatively unobtrusive. The Ellerslie Road Stand opposite is similarly supported but offers just one tier. It is the least remarkable stand of the four but by no means unattractive. The School End and Loftus Road are virtually identical and also the most interesting. They comprise of two tightly packed overhung tiers almost running the width of the entire ground. Their roofs converge with those of the South Africa and Ellerslie Road stands, not seamlessly but coherently enough to present the stadium as a single entity. That the fasciae are all painted the same shade of blue augments this impression. The stadium is completely enclosed and the boundary between the stands and the pitch is contiguous. Incidental features include a video screen mounted above the School End, a television gantry suspended below the roof of the Ellerslie Road Stand, and four elegantly slim floodlight pylons emanating from behind the School and Loftus Road ends.
Problem: a limited capacity of 18,439. For the last forty odd years Queens Park Rangers have oscillated consistently between the top two strata of the English Football League. Currently competing in the second, theyâ€™re averaging an attendance of around 14,000. If they were to be promoted this capacity would be found wanting. It is reasonable, then, that QPR are examining the possibility of relocating to Old Oak Common with the intention of building a new ground with room enough for 40,000 fans. This sort of thing takes time. Should QPR face relegation, rather than promotion, these plans will more than likely be shelved. In such an event, their fans can console themselves with their continued residency at Loftus Road.
Kenilworth Road is as confined as Loftus Road, but with added eccentricities. Comprised of five separate stands, the shape delineated is actually of an irregular hexagon. The A505 (Hatters Way) and the Luton to Dunstable Busway interrupts the Main Stand at an acute angle and the crooked David Preece Stand fills in the gap awkwardly. It has the appearance of a diminutive two-tiered structure thatâ€™s been bent in the middle and had the lower tier removed (to provide access). It holds 711 spectators.
The Bobbers Stand is odder still, comprised of what passes for executive boxes. Whose idea was this? It was never a very big stand on account of the housing behind, although it used to accommodate 1,539 seated supporters. I have not been able to find out how many it seats now but it canâ€™t be much more than a few hundred.
The Oak Road Stand (capacity 1,800), and the strangeness doesnâ€™t let up. Its roof, pitched, is comprised of three staggered sections that rise in height to meet the Main Stand to its right. The entrance occupies what at one point must have been the ground floors of two neighbouring terraced houses, yet the top floors, and the front doors leading to them, remain intact. Once the fan has passed under these tenements they must climb a set of stairs that offer an intimate view of the terraced gardens either side. (Loftus Roadâ€™s surroundings appear boundless by comparison.)
Then thereâ€™s the Main Stand, which isnâ€™t without eccentricity either. It appears at first glance fairly cohesive, but not only does it have to put up with the David Preece Standâ€™s clumsy incursion on its territory, three floodlight pylons blight the lower terrace. These arenâ€™t the spindly stanchions incorporated so successfully at Loftus Road but more substantial latticed steel affairs. The clubâ€™s offices and utilities and the Nick Owen and Eric Morecambe suites are built on the back.
Finally, thereâ€™s the Kenilworth Stand, which has a flat roof, 3,229 seats, no significant visual encumbrances and room enough for a car park out the front.
The stadiums of early antiquity were nothing more than acclivities with the ground levelled before them. These grassy verges were later fashioned into actual terraces, but they were still built upon naturally sloping land â€“ there was no exterior to speak of. Practically speaking, it was the Romans who built the first freestanding amphitheatres, radically changing how these structures presented themselves. From possessing just one functional aspect, the stadium now possessed three: the faÃ§ade, the interior, and the cavea.
This multi-dimensional perspective does not normally apply. Where form follows function, a buildingâ€™s relationship with itself is more usually binary, symbiotic. Its innards cater to its functionality â€“ a place to sleep, eat, work, etc. â€“ and the external walls are present by default, to bear the roof and to demarcate the territory. The same cannot be said of the stadium, where the inside is outside too because what goes on inside is taking place outside. Its exterior then is continuous: it can be interpreted as both its inward and outward appearance. In its rawest form, what might be referred to as the stadiumâ€™s walls are in fact the underside of the cavea: they are not designed to protect this exposed internality but to physically uphold it. (Where an actual interior is present it is subservient to the building as a whole, providing toilets, ticket offices, changing rooms, and other extraneous utilities. In this respect, the stadium is comparable to the railway station.)
Unlike those early auditoriums of antiquity (or even some of the Soviet â€˜superbowlsâ€™ that were dug into the earth after the Second World War: Warsawâ€™s 10th-Anniversary Stadium; the Kirov Stadium in St. Petersburg) Loftus and Kenilworth Road are freestanding structures. Except, so hemmed in are they, if you tore their floodlights down you might struggle to find them. There are no boulevards, concourses, squares, parks, or any other types of open space, from which to view these buildings as independent structures. But where one can ascertain an external presence at QPR â€“ if you look for it â€“ itâ€™s a real struggle at Luton. From Ivy, Beech and Clifton Roads, one encounters fragments of breeze blocked walls and corrugated steel, random brickwork and wooden doors, peeling paint and corroded air-conditioning units. For all the onlooker knows, theyâ€™ve come up against something like an industrial estate or the back-end of a bingo hall.
I do not mean to disparage Kenilworth Road. A football ground can live with a shabby exterior, the atmosphere within unaffected; who is to say that a stadiumâ€™s aesthetic appeal rests upon the ability to perceive it from a variety of angles. I suppose the problem for many of these smaller grounds is the uncertain choices that their clubs face: to move on, redevelop, or settle for what theyâ€™ve got. And if move on, then where to?
FOLLOW JAMES ON TWITTER @JDEvans75